-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
1. No, it's an argument from evidence.
2. Any examples?
3. The only people changing definitions are the critics. First they rely on attacking false definitions
(Ken Miller for instance), then we call them out on it, then they accuse US of "moving the goal
posts." Happens the same way every time.
4. I know of only a few books that make a sociological analysis of Darwinian thought, but the
contents of those are irrelevant to what undirected processes are capable of doing.
5. When does this usually take place? By the same logic should people like Michael Ruse be
removed from the discussion?
6. Of course: http://www.uncommondescent.com/evolution/dont-fire-him-just-make-his-work-situation-a-living-hell/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)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=X7X6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments that aren't encrypted with my key and are also digitally signed with sender's own key go to the trash. I might skim them for lulz though...
This is the policy given to me by Janus. They don't agree with my views, but since they are willing to protect my real identity this is the least I can do in return.
Crypto-IDEA WA: Don't waste your time here. We have a far more cryptographically secure outpost than this one...