Semi-Hiatus Post

Okay so maybe I got WAYYY to deep in preventing imposters from... imposting.

As you can tell the lengths I went were a little too far. So I've decided to stop putting so much time and effort into this crap and just leave comments like a normal human being over at Uncommon Descent. That looks like an excellent community to have conversations with and I've neglected to make good use of it for a few years now. Time to change that - and time to start giving two cents here and there where possible.

Other than that, I've started a seperate blog dedicated to something I've never had the chance to put nearly as much effort into as I would have liked until recently:

crypto-idea.blogspot.com

 



 

That should turn out to be a cool project as it develops. In particular, the post that collects book defenses will be of use as time goes on. On top of that, it will be useful for catologing club discussion topics and allowing anyone else who wants to mirror what we do at a later date to do the same. I and a few others have started a mini revolution amongst otherwise apathetic persons who now realize just how fascinating this stuff really is. Can't wait to see how this turns out.

 

 

The only forseable purpose this blog might have is if I need to digitally verify that a statement came from me in some emergency circumstance. Oh, and the link to my public key sure would come in handy:

 

http://jeffreyhelix.blogspot.com/2011/01/my-public-key-rsa-3072-bits-jeffrey.html

 

So to finish this off, I'd just like to point out that you can catch most of what I do on the IDEA club blog I linked to above as well as through occasional comments on Uncommon Descent and ENV.

 

-Jeffrey Helix

Comment on The Genome's Tale

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
This is excellent material you have on the site so far. I hope you start blogging regularly again,
because you clearly know deeper material that I wish more people were aware of.
Perhaps I should join the conversations on Uncommon Descent again.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)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=G7Sz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Scaffolding and Irreducibility - Sententias

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Thomas - could you point to any biological examples of this scaffolding evolutionary process?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)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=/903
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Comment on Sententias Post

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

While I generally haven't considered myself to be a religious person, I will definitely be looking into this further.

You've definitely given me a lot to think about...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
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=6DsV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Response to "Hrafn" on Sententias

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

1. No, it's an argument from evidence.

2. Any examples?

3. The only people changing definitions are the critics. First they rely on attacking false definitions
(Ken Miller for instance), then we call them out on it, then they accuse US of "moving the goal
posts." Happens the same way every time.

4. I know of only a few books that make a sociological analysis of Darwinian thought, but the
contents of those are irrelevant to what undirected processes are capable of doing.

5. When does this usually take place? By the same logic should people like Michael Ruse be
removed from the discussion?

6. Of course: http://www.uncommondescent.com/evolution/dont-fire-him-just-make-his-work-situation-a-living-hell/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)

iQGcBAEBAgAGBQJQKGvRAAoJEAlY1kTu1KLhnlgMAJvSktHwio+NVWe59QcwuAq/
5BEr0hgn9wVj78PpDBHzjPeegeMRifwHaYVFS/o8Du8IFLjjTgCpVEMd5IYzoLIE
jexJWTNl8IUIs1Wi45zsB/KMK0eWzLnivlRcXFuhkgOnZQYDzQ9U5uUDjGB8QksJ
MM4iPLhYirl/jErGL6Ayh6eEDX1YdOMfMVxxVNDKH+mrAQRRYf1ofT45YdqAZDX0
Rm/A0JdZZVtuX4mqNQegdhhkvNMnQSJ/e95xkxqsp6/LIB5VGO/1gssNWuFmKnrR
af/n3jgMIQ76R+X5dE8XlY9R31eJXrjAR+y1i9ATxwLK2gqiNR7NU5Ea2UMz5fVg
nfozq6Azn6xYS9vE5pDKh0rDkJKic3fk/lOkF1bGNyabRE5NMWARAIgWHBxt/PBD
SWaeMggY0JzrRzToCbPdmsP00ioo8B7qJNC/u+119GAcUORYNSpDmRaIJQECSMfZ
HvWVcico7qOza7n3WC/azoJEx2c0wfe1AJ9sgXZCLA==
=X7X6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Endorsement of Sententias

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

You've put together an excellent piece there, and it looks like I might become a regular reader
here even if I might have some disagreements beyond ID itself.

I think I'll actually start recommending this site to others.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
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=GC2d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

"What Are the Top Ten Problems w/Darwinian Evolution"

Multiple comments in for this post.

 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I dare you (or anyone else on any side of this discussion) to define positive evidence.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
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=TmMJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dark matter? Quantum theory?

Do we throw those out of consideration by the same standard since the former cannot be
studied directly and the latter has no tangible mechanism?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
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=uK9N
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I'm definitely adding this ENV post to my collection of things to pass on to anyone who wants a
crash course on this debate.

As an addition within #4, I would add that selection also has trouble eliminating deleterious
mutations if they start off as neutral but become harmful as they accumulate. By the time the
aggregate effect of otherwise neutral mutations become negative, it's too late to eliminate them
 one by one.

This lack of foresight is a bigger problem for organisms with larger genomes, as highlighted in the
 book "Genetic Entropy."
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)

iQGcBAEBAgAGBQJQBy+IAAoJEAlY1kTu1KLhA4UL/imPlOG+xDTiO4lkkHEBtZEM
q7wFVJk8mb+qdjOm0+ONbs/ssTwhD+LHm8vqQ2/Eq83dpn3lO92NyEg3tPsPqxDW
Mcg9mFGYxI0ADZTrCrRm9FzvDVQgVNQmFQ0d8bh5XTFqXUoBtCH+QfdoagYsr+VU
mckx3A91zgga1xrXJunEPLEx7mTs4C/1/B8meVZhydFJdmrbuW2VRFhzL8anxL42
1fgzDAAqjt+WndhKfHUPZ041MCQpuSyF2JZalGHrZUeamTfsv8QmFTVGOB1k+Cnv
kRomy8YuJyJIoPQDCFmvL62mkR9MrJ63+eHdsGY29MiD8JivOaJt6Ra1SrVi8FVH
tHjPTfeaBh9tIzulgFwhW9Ne12uCkLJHxB7tWwurJRVKKtZZuzwk8DFSk/BITmE7
xapdBepmmyzWDUvs6KT59j/CEH96ysUP4Yrto6bkCvMmh35ILFbRz1uhZfqbKTrJ
eaNuMD3hS73NIP6DoMdV4nXS+Ue4jlEdKiGaAX0iDg==
=uWTn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----